Prepare for the Maryland Home Improvement Test. Study using flashcards and multiple-choice questions, each with hints and explanations. Get ready to excel on your exam!

Each practice test/flash card set has 50 randomly selected questions from a bank of over 500. You'll get a new set of questions each time!

Practice this question and more.


What is the advantage of a Federal court hearing for a complaint under Federal Fair Housing laws?

  1. The case will be more thoroughly reviewed.

  2. There is no dollar limit on damages paid.

  3. Only a district court judge can order property sale to the complaining party.

  4. Only a district court judge can order jail time for the guilty party.

The correct answer is: There is no dollar limit on damages paid.

The advantage of a Federal court hearing for a complaint under Federal Fair Housing laws is that there is no dollar limit on damages paid. This means that if a party is found to have violated fair housing laws, the potential financial compensation awarded to the complainant can be significantly higher than that which might be awarded in a state court or other venues with prescribed limits on damages. This provides a powerful incentive for individuals to bring complaints under federal law, as they can pursue full redress without the limitations that might otherwise apply in state-level settings. In contrast, the other options do not accurately reflect the practices or provisions related to federal court hearings. Typically, federal courts address the legal aspects of housing discrimination, but they do not have a monopoly over specific remedies such as property sales or imprisonment, which can be influenced by state laws as well. Additionally, a case being reviewed more thoroughly is subjective and can vary based on numerous factors, thus it is not a guaranteed advantage of federal court hearings.